Lenses
No other factor
determines image quality more than the lenses in the optic. There is a
vast array of conditions that ultimately determines the overall
performance. As the precision and quality of the mountings, lenses,
coatings, and glass increases so does the cost. Light passes through
and reflects on glass surfaces with multiple
effects. The challenge is to utilize the light entering the optic and
focus it into an image with minimal loss to obtain as bright and sharp an
image as possible.
The
different colors (or wavelengths) of light pass through the lenses and
bend at slightly different angles, similar to a prism. Several lenses of
different types of glass and designs are required to get each of the basic
colors to focus correctly in the image. Uncorrected elements produce
blurred images with distortions and muddied colors. Special types of
glass are now commonly used to help alleviate some
of the distortions and problems associated with the light passing through
lenses. Optic manufacturers are progressively using more exotic, very
dense (ED, HD, SD, etc.) glass and minerals such as fluorite (CaF2)
along with sophisticated designs to solve these problems.
Mirrors
The mirrors (or
prisms) within an optic are just as important as the lenses. Some of the
inherent problems associated with the mountings were addressed previously
in the discussion (Basics
I) of the differences between Porro and Roof Prism designs.
Like
the lenses the mirrors must also be coated to prevent the scatter of
light. Roof prism designs generally also include anti-phase shifting
coatings that prevent an interference problem associated with this type of
optic. Other special coatings are also applied to the mirrors of optics to
improve light transmission. Since, as consumers, we do not get to
choose the type of process the mirrors receive we do not address these in
detail although it should be noted that they are important to image
quality.
|
FIGURE #1
|
 |
Lower
priced optics will often use BK7 prisms where better optics use BAK4
prisms. BK7 prisms produce an exit pupil with shaded edges. The BAK4 prism
projects a nice round exit pupil (see Figure #1). In bright daylight where
your eye pupils are smaller than the exit pupil of the optic, you may not
notice this distortion. As the light level drops and your eye pupils
become larger, this aberration becomes more apparent around the edges of
your view with BK7 prisms.
Coatings
As noted previously, whenever light is transmitted through a lens,
some light reflects from the lens surface and is lost. Thin coatings are
deposited on the lens faces to reduce reflective loss and improve light
transmission. With the large number of lenses in a binocular or scope,
these coatings can be as important as the quality of the lens itself.
Without these coatings, each lens may lose up to 5% of the light.
Lenses with multi-coatings may reduce this loss to tenths of a
percent. Thus, a poor optic may loose as much as 35% of the light entering
the objective where quality designs may lose less than 5% total.
The
coatings also improve the image quality since the reflected light bouncing
around in the interior of the optic washes out detail and blurs colors.
Manufacturers of quality optics add several thin coatings (as many as 7)
to optimize transmission of each of the basic colors. The coatings
typically described in the literature are defined in the following ways:
Coated
(C) Optics
A thin anti-reflective coating (usually of Magnesium Fluorite) is
deposited on one or more of the lens surfaces.
Fully
Coated (FC) Optics
At least one thin anti-reflective coating coating on both sides of
the objective lens system, both sides of the ocular lens system, and the
long side of the prism.
Multi-coated
(MC) Optics
One
or more of the lens surfaces have multiple coatings. Even some of the best
optics have only a single coating on the outside lens surface. This is
done under the theory that a single coating is harder, more durable and
the light reflected from the outer surface does not affect image contrast.
Fully-multi-coated
(FMC) Optics
All lens surfaces have multiple coatings. This is generally the case
with the top-of-the-line optics. This does not guarantee the best quality,
(quality is in the execution!) but it is an indicator that greater care
and thought has gone into the design.
In
conclusion, optical coatings are extremely important to delivering a sharp
and bright image. Some coating schemes simply work better than others.
An FMC 8 x 35 binocular can actually appear both sharper and
brighter than a 8 x 42 binocular with poor coatings.
Distortions
Modern optics
generally do a good job at presenting a normal image to the eye, although
an absolutely perfect image is close to impossible, even with modern
materials. Lenses have curved surfaces to focus the light. Thus,
presenting a flat image to the eye can be a challenge. As you move from
the center towards the edges, the image tends to stretch out... much as a
map does. These distortions are called Curvature of Field and are
probably the most common distortions.
Fortunately,Curvature
of Field is probably the least damaging to the view since it is most
obvious only very close to the edges. It is commonly noticed when you have
a straight object, like a telephone pole, at the edge of the view. In this
case, the image of the telephone pole will begin to curve slightly as it
nears the edge of the view. Since most of us center what we are looking
at, this is usually not a big problem.
The
problem is more of a nuisance when the edges of the view also focus at a
different point than the center. This is most common with wide-angle
designs. Sometimes it is impossible to get the center of the field of view
in focus at the same time as the edges. There are optics on the market,
including wide-angle designs, that completely alleviate this distortion
although they are both heavy and expensive. Most optics deal with this
type of distortion quite well and it does not generally cause any great
problems.
Two
other types of distortions that should be mentioned here are pincushion
and barrel distortions. These are not commonly noticed in modern
optic designs. They are caused by the center and edge of the field of view
being at different magnifications. The variations in magnification causes
the whole view to slightly distort from center to edge and draw shapes out
of true perspective. Specifically, barrel distortions magnify the
center of an image more than the edges causing it to "bow out". Pincushiondistortions
magnify the center of an image less than the edges causing it to "bow
in".
Aberrations
Aberrations
are similar to distortions and the terms are sometimes interchanged.
Strictly speaking, aberrations are considered to be a result of an
intrinsic defect prohibiting all of the information from an object to be
focused orderly in the image. This results in reduced image sharpness and
color-smear or loss of definition.
Chromatic
aberration is most commonly mentioned since it is the most obvious. As was
noted earlier, different colors of light bend at slightly different angles
when they pass through a normal lens. Uncorrected, this produces an image
with a muddy fringe of unfocused light. The overall damage to the true
colors and contrast can be dramatic since this muddy fringe is actually
happening throughout the whole image. Most optics deal with this problem
by using a pair of achromatic lenses. These are lenses made of different
glasses, each one keyed to bringing a different color into focus.
Low-dispersion
(ED, HD, SD, etc.) glasses are becoming more popular. These high-density
glasses reduce color separations dramatically. Contrary to achromatic
lenses that key on focusing specific spectra of light, these new
high-density glasses greatly reduce color separation altogether. They are
not perfect nor do they completely eliminate chromatic aberration, but
they produce an observable difference over standard achromatic lenses.
These new materials combined with complex designs produce optimum color
fidelity and contrast.
Another
aberration receiving more attention is coma. The results of this are that
light that passes through the center of a lens can be focused to a point.
The light the passes through the lens off-axis (at an angle) will not
focus to a point and look like a fuzzy circle. The further off-axis the
more the light smears, giving objects a comet-like look. This is not to be
confused with curvature of field and cannot be focused out. This is
generally fairly well-controlled in modern optics.
Last
is spherical aberration, that results from the actual curvature of the
lens. A spherical lens surface focuses the light from the edge of the lens
to a closer focal point than the light from the center of the lens. The
result is an image lacking sharpness, detail and brightness. The solution
to the problem is to add another lens in the path with a complex curve
computed to correct the image.
Often
you hear the term "residual aberration". This term is used as a
"catch all" to describe combinations of aberrations that are not
fully dealt with in the design. Residual aberrations lead to all the
negative optical outcomes described above. In combination we get a sort of
optical mud. The images lack sharpness, true colors, detail, contrast,
etc. Optics manufacturers are getting better at resolving these problems
through both design and materials but there is no optic that completely
eliminates all distortions and aberrations.
Alignment
Modern
optics may have as many as 10 pieces of glass serving different functions
and most have at least 6. Proper alignment of all the elements, including
the mirrors, will determine the final image quality. The position of all
these elements must be precise in order for them to function and do what
they are supposed to do. Each element must also be held and secured
firmly. If the alignment shifts, the image quality suffers no matter how
well the lenses were designed and processed.
In
scopes, the distances are larger than with binoculars and slight
misalignments can dramatically degrade image quality. With binoculars, the
two barrels that must match so that the same image, focused to the same
point and size, reaches our eyes. Our eyes may not be perfectly aligned
and our brain will make some adjustments to differences between the images
reaching our eyes. Improper alignment causes fatigue, eyestrain, inferior
or double images and even nausea.
The
term for the alignment between the barrels of a binocular is
“collimation”. Collimation is a measure of how exactly parallel the
barrels are mounted. The barrels are hinged so that they can be adjusted
to suit the differentdistances between people’s pupils. This hinge
must be precise to maintain collimation between the barrels and eliminate
slop or play in their position. Low-priced optics often have trouble with
consistently accurate barrel placement.
The
layman test for proper barrel collimation or alignment is to look through
the binoculars backwards (through the objective lenses) and try to sight
on a horizontal line. If the alignment is not correct, the line will not
be straight as seen through both objectives (the view through one side
will be tilted).
Conclusions
-
The
lenses in optics are of critical importance. New materials are
providing images with enhanced purity of colors and contrast.
- Lens
coatings can be as important as the lenses themselves. The coatings
improve light transmission and reduce internal light scatter that
degrade image quality and brightness.
- Distortions
are less damaging to image quality and are becoming better controlled
with modern optics.
-
Residual
aberrations are mostly a combination of 3 common intrinsic
defects. They cause poor image quality, contrast and reduce
color fidelity.
- Precise
and secure alignment of elements is critical to the optic performance.
If the elements move, the image quality suffers.
- Poor
barrel collimation causes fatigue and can be difficult to notice. The
hinge must firmly secure the barrels in parallel position and
eliminate sideways play.
Previous Article - Basics III | Next
Article - Scopes
|