How the Optics4Birding Scorecard Works
Instructions
Looking at binocular pages
one at a time, it gets difficult to remember specifications to make comparisons.
To facilitate that process, the Optics4Birding Scorecard allows you to
select up to four binoculars and compare them side by side. Select binoculars
while surfing the site, or from the menus on the scorecard page. All binoculars
have certain specifications such as minimum close focus, eye relief or
such. We took all the specifications that apply to binoculars and gave
each rating within the range of values possible for that specification,
a score from 1 (lowest) to 10 indicating our evaluation how that binocular
ranks for that specification. The Scorecard then totals all the scores
for each binocular selected, giving an overall comparison. Since not everyone
has the same preferences in binocular traits, the O4B Scorecard lets you
apply your own preference factor for each specification. Preference factors
range from 10 (most important) to 0 (irrelevant). On your first visit,
the preference factors will all be set to 5, the intermediate score. You
can change these factors to fit what you want in a binocular. The raw
scores are multiplied by the preference factors, personalizing the scores
to the way you use your binoculars. Note: the Scorecard does not apply
to image-stabilization binoculars, whose weight and cost (among other
factors) is governed by the image-stabilization technology in ways that
invalidate the scoring mechanism.
Setting Preference Factors
When setting your preference
factors, it is essential to remember that all binocular designs are a
set of compromises required by the physical laws that govern optics. For
example, it is impossible to get very short close focus, wide angle of
view, and long eye relief at the same time, or to make a binocular with
a large objective lens and low weight without using expensive materials.
Set your preference factors high for the parameters that are important
to you. Don't set them all to 10 to try and find the perfect binocular.
We divide the total score by the number of non-zero preference factors,
so setting them all to 10 gives the same relative score as setting them
all to any other number.
On every visit, you will be
able to check a box to save your current preferences in a cookie so they
are there the next time you visit. (Optics4Birding believes that cookies
should be for the convenience of visitors only. We use the information
in cookies only to make your visit easier. We do not set cookies without
your permission, and do not use the data in the cookies for any other
purpose.)
Scoring Criteria
Each parameter in the O4B Scorecard
is scored by a method appropriate for that parameter. For some, we were
able to write an equation that describes how we think the scores should
fall. For others, scores have to change at different rates in different
parts of the range. For these, we decided on scores and entered them into
a reference table. Either way, we feel these scores are representative
of how most birders knowledgeable about optics would judge each parameter.
To help you determine which parameters are (or should be) important to
you, each parameter links to its respective discussion in the All About
Optics section of this website.
Eye Relief
Eye relief for all binoculars,
of any magnification, ranges from about 10mm up to 25mm. Eye relief longer
than 22mm has negative side effects, making it harder to keep ones eyes
aligned with the image. Eyeglass wearers need a bit more eye relief, but
too much still has the same problem. We therefore use reference tables
with different scales depending on whether you wear eyeglasses.
Eye Relief |
Without Glasses |
With Glasses |
|
|
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
13 |
5 |
1 |
14 |
6 |
2 |
15 |
8 |
3 |
16 |
9 |
4 |
17 |
10 |
5 |
18 |
10 |
6 |
19 |
10 |
7 |
20 |
10 |
8 |
21 |
9 |
9 |
22 |
8 |
10 |
23 |
6 |
9 |
24 |
4 |
7 |
25 |
2 |
5 |
When using the scorecard, set
the importance factor to 0 for any parameter that doesn't apply to you.
Close Focus
Outstanding binoculars, usable
for insect study, can focus as closely as 3 feet, but anything below 6
feet is exceptional. Marine binoculars and other field glasses can only
focus to 20 feet or more. This range is normalized so that 5 feet or less
scores 10 and 23 feet scores 1, with the formula:
12½ - (CF / 2)
Weight
Higher power binoculars tend
to be heavier than lower power binoculars, but weight can also add stability
if the binocular is well balanced. Regardless, too much weight can cause
fatigue after a long day in the field. Our scoring function is non-linear
and discontinuous, so we address it with a reference table.
Weight |
Score |
|
|
<25 |
10 |
26 |
9.5 |
27 |
9.0 |
28 |
8.5 |
29 |
8.0 |
30 |
7.0 |
31 |
6.0 |
32 |
5.0 |
33 |
4.5 |
34 |
4.0 |
35 |
3.5 |
36 |
3.0 |
37 |
2.5 |
38 |
2.0 |
39 |
1.5 |
40+ |
1.0 |
Field of View
The field of view is usually
measured by the width (in feet) of the visible field at 1,000 yards distance.
This field is directly related to power, so that higher power binoculars
have a narrower field of view. To compare binoculars of differing magnification,
we can calculate the apparent angle of view, which is the angle the observer
sees when as if standing at the actual distance divided by the magnification
rather than looking through the binoculars. Except for subcompact binoculars,
this apparent angle ranges from about 45° to about 70° (with 65º and
above being considered “wide angle”). Field of view is given a discontinuous
scoring system for several reasons. First, while having a wide field of
view can be useful, it isn’t necessarily an unmixed blessing. Frequently,
truly wide-angle binoculars suffer somewhat in clarity and sharpness because
of the optical compromise made in the design in order to provide that
panoramic field. Accordingly, we have given the widest field binoculars
somewhat lower scores to reflect this tendency.
Apparent Angle |
Score |
|
|
<45 |
1 |
46 |
2 |
47 |
3 |
48 |
3 |
49 |
4 |
50 |
5 |
51 |
5 |
52 |
6 |
53 |
6 |
54 |
7 |
55 |
7 |
56 |
8 |
57 |
8 |
58 |
9 |
59 |
9 |
60 |
10 |
61 |
10 |
62 |
10 |
63 |
10 |
64 |
9 |
65 |
9 |
66 |
8 |
67 |
8 |
68 |
7 |
69 |
7 |
>70 |
6 |
Waterproofing
The levels of waterproofing
are not a continuum, but discrete levels. Porro prisms get lower scores
at the same level of waterproofing because their external focusing mechanisms
cause wear to the waterproofing seals. Thus, we assign the following scores:
none = 1
shower-proof = 3
waterproof porros = 5
waterproof roofs = 7
nitrogen-purged porro = 7
waterproof and nitrogen-purged roofs = 10
Eyecups
Eyecups are rated for durability, comfort, and adjustability.
rubber = 3
slide-up = 4
slide-up and lock = 5
twist-up = 7
wrap-around = 8 (if not an eyeglass wearer)
twist-up with detents = 10
Lens coating
Lens coatings are rated by
the number or percentage of lens surfaces that are coated.
none = 1
coated = 4
multi-coated = 7
fully multi-coated = 10
Prisms
With prisms, ratings evaluate
both the material in the glass and the coatings.
BK-7 = 3
BaK-4 = 6
Phase Coated = 8
Exotic Phase Coated = 10
Class
Scaled from 0.2 (lowest quality)
to 1.0 (top quality) in steps of 0.2, this factor is used to give a balance
between optical quality class and price, and is multiplied by the score
from all the other factors to give a final score. In most cases, Class
is determined by manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP), binoculars
of scopes that are particularly better or worse than their MSRP might
indicate they have their Class adjusted to the appropriate level.
MSRP |
Score |
|
|
$1.00 - $99.00 |
0.2 |
$100.00 - $249.00 |
0.4 |
$250.00 - $599.00 |
0.6 |
$600.00 - $999.00 |
0.8 |
$1,000.00 - $2,000.00 |
1.0 |
Scorecard | Introduction